Ad
Court rules in favour of university in UL furniture case
Image by: EUR
Erasmus University does not have to repeat the tendering procedure for the university library furniture. The court reached this decision in preliminary relief proceedings instituted against EUR by a party competing for the contract.
EUR opted for supplier Ahrend. Facilitylinq, a competing supplier, contested EUR’s decision. Facilitylinq wanted to have the matter reviewed because it was of the opinion that it had been unjustly rejected as a competing party. The court did not share this opinion.
The ruling means that EUR does not have to repeat the tendering procedure. The opening of the modernised university library was delayed by the preliminary relief proceedings. As a result of the court’s ruling, however, the delay will remain limited and the opening will probably take place in May. Students will be able to start using the 900 additional study spaces before the end of the academic year.
More UL
De redactie
Latest news
-
Desperate medical students are offering each other money to start their internships earlier
Gepubliceerd op:-
Education
-
-
Still a shortage of 20,000 student homes
Gepubliceerd op:-
Housing
-
-
‘With gadgets like Meta Glasses, we pay to be surveilled’
Gepubliceerd op:-
The Issue
-
Comments
Comments are closed.
Ad
Read more in Campus
-
AI in thesis is not always fraud, rules highest education court
Gepubliceerd op:-
Artificial Intelligence
-
Education
-
-
CPB: international students bring money into the Netherlands
Gepubliceerd op:-
Internationalisation
-
