‘If societal issues should be debated anywhere, it is at universities’
We would like to take this opportunity to respond to the opinion piece published in Erasmus Magazine the other day. The article states that ‘climate change deniers’ – the authors believe that Thierry Baudet is one – should not be invited to debates held at universities. Since we are organising the debate in question, we would like to respond to this statement, because we happen to have a different opinion. We actually believe that Baudet’s participation will add to the debate.

To explain why we hold this opinion, let us look at what the event is all about. Every year, In Duplo organises the In Discussio conference for students, alumni and employees of Erasmus University. Our aim in doing so is to make a meaningful contribution to a topical subject of societal interest. This year, we chose to discuss energy transition. Therefore, the evening’s theme will be: Energy Transition: Full Steam Ahead or Slow Down?
Every year, we take a multidisciplinary approach to a particular theme. This year, too, we, the organising committee, tried very hard to find speakers from various backgrounds. Our list of speakers can be said to be highly diverse this year, since our speakers include politicians, scientists and members of the business community.
‘Not inviting someone because his opinion differs from yours is inconsistent with academic freedom’
As mentioned above, we do not share the opinion that Mr Baudet should not have been invited; if societal debates can and must be held anywhere, it is at universities. Not inviting someone because his opinion differs from yours is inconsistent with academic freedom. For instance, such debates may touch on what has actually been researched by scientists and what has not. We believe the current line-up of speakers provides attendees with a proper diversity of perspectives with regard to energy transition, thus allowing everyone to make up his own mind.
We think it is unfortunate that such unfounded opinion pieces, without any citations, stir up exactly the kind of commotion the authors mentioned.
We are looking forward to today’s debate!
Comments
2 reacties
Comments are closed.
Read more in opinion
-
If the rector can spout AI nonsense, then so can everyone else
Gepubliceerd op:-
Column
-
-
At the end of the year, Erasmus Magazine wishes everyone an empty head, warm hands and a full heart
Gepubliceerd op:-
Editorial
-
-
The gloomy Christmas of Erasmus
Gepubliceerd op:-
Column
-
Simone op 11 April 2019 om 20:17
I have an idea for another debate for you: Are women just intellectually inferior to and less ambitious than men? Let’s discuss this in the free market place of ideas! Or maybe: Does racism still happen or are black people just imagining it? Let’s hear both sides and ignore the research. Everyone can decide for themselves, we as an purely objective platform take no sides!
Kevin op 14 April 2019 om 15:53
If you are ideas are so incredibly weak that you are afraid an opposing view will rapidly change your mind, then you have a problem with your critical thinking. Assuming that everyone else’s beliefs are *not* based on solid analysis is an insult to our human capabilities of reasoning. I do not believe that college-educated students, which would be target audience at this event, have a problem with grounding their beliefs in facts.
Just because an opinion does not agree with yours does not make it wrong. It is a lot more profound and nuanced than that.