Erasmus TV: ‘A good university should be able to offer high-quality education, both offline and online’
De redactie
-
Feba SukmanaEditor
Latest news
-
RSC/RVSV accused of poo stunt targeting student houses in Utrecht
Gepubliceerd op:-
Student life
-
-
Significantly more reports to confidential counsellors, more complex cases as well
Gepubliceerd op:-
Safety
-
-
EM TV newsflash: Porn in Pavilion, no joint Eurekaweek and highest interest rate for student debt in decades
Gepubliceerd op:Article type: Video-
EM TV
-
Comments
1 reactie
Comments are closed.
Read more in Video
-
EM TV newsflash: Porn in Pavilion, no joint Eurekaweek and highest interest rate for student debt in decades
Gepubliceerd op:Article type: Video-
EM TV
-
-
EM TV newsflash: New portraits of female professors, hesitation to report social unsafety and scientists in theatre
Gepubliceerd op:Article type: Video-
EM TV
-
-
EM TV newsflash: Too many internationals, too many information platforms and more collaboration with the military
Gepubliceerd op:Article type: Video-
EM TV
-
N. op 22 July 2020 om 13:41
Just to clarify my understanding :
1- the survey did not compare Erasmus during the Coronavirus crisis against the other universities in NL and in the world. It compared Erasmus during the Coronavirus crisis versus Erasmus before the global crisis. Why? I miss the point of not looking at the competition, and the point of being nostalgic. The real question is: are we the best in the world when it comes to teaching during the crisis? What do we need to do to be the best?
2- the survey wished to measure the truth – the quality of education during the coronacrisis. But it asked people who have monetary interests to not say the truth: the worst they say the education was, the more likely (they think) they are to get money in their pockets in the form of reimbursement. The measurement should have taken that into account. As the saying goes: measure twice, cut once.
Why does not EM do a survey taking into account the above?