Erasmus TV: ‘A good university should be able to offer high-quality education, both offline and online’
De redactie
-
Feba SukmanaEditor
Latest news
-
Simona moved from Groningen to Katendrecht by train
Gepubliceerd op:-
Student life
-
-
More than 1,500 euros extra in tuition fees for non-European students: U-council wants to limit increases
Gepubliceerd op:-
Internationalisation
-
Money
-
-
Free Furniture Festival on campus: students leave with sofas and paper holders
Gepubliceerd op:-
Student life
-
Comments
1 reactie
Comments are closed.
Read more in Video
-
Hangovers and hoarse voices at a boozy brunch in the park
Gepubliceerd op:Article type: Video-
EM TV
-
Eurekaweek
-
-
Eurekaweek day 3: Rotterdam Mozaic, potluck, final event
Gepubliceerd op:Article type: Video-
EM TV
-
Eurekaweek
-
-
Sumo, rugby or climbing – who can beat Saskia at Sports & Play?
Gepubliceerd op:Article type: Video-
EM TV
-
Eurekaweek
-
N. op 22 July 2020 om 13:41
Just to clarify my understanding :
1- the survey did not compare Erasmus during the Coronavirus crisis against the other universities in NL and in the world. It compared Erasmus during the Coronavirus crisis versus Erasmus before the global crisis. Why? I miss the point of not looking at the competition, and the point of being nostalgic. The real question is: are we the best in the world when it comes to teaching during the crisis? What do we need to do to be the best?
2- the survey wished to measure the truth – the quality of education during the coronacrisis. But it asked people who have monetary interests to not say the truth: the worst they say the education was, the more likely (they think) they are to get money in their pockets in the form of reimbursement. The measurement should have taken that into account. As the saying goes: measure twice, cut once.
Why does not EM do a survey taking into account the above?