{"id":97789,"date":"2019-04-11T13:18:20","date_gmt":"2019-04-11T11:18:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.erasmusmagazine.nl\/en\/?p=97789"},"modified":"2025-12-19T11:23:17","modified_gmt":"2025-12-19T10:23:17","slug":"if-societal-issues-should-be-debated-anywhere-it-is-at-universities","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.erasmusmagazine.nl\/en\/2019\/04\/11\/if-societal-issues-should-be-debated-anywhere-it-is-at-universities\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018If societal issues should be debated anywhere, it is at universities\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"

We would like to take this opportunity to respond to the\u00a0opinion piece<\/a><\/u>\u00a0published in Erasmus Magazine the other day. The article states that \u2018climate change deniers\u2019 \u2013 the authors believe that Thierry Baudet is one \u2013 should not be invited to debates held at universities. Since we are organising the debate in question, we would like to respond to this statement, because we happen to have a different opinion. We actually believe that Baudet\u2019s participation will add to the debate.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>

To explain why we hold this opinion, let us look at what the event is all about. Every year, In Duplo organises the\u00a0In Discussio<\/em>\u00a0conference for students, alumni and employees of Erasmus University. Our aim in doing so is to make a meaningful contribution to a topical subject of societal interest. This year, we chose to discuss energy transition. Therefore, the evening\u2019s theme will be:\u00a0Energy Transition: Full Steam Ahead or Slow Down?<\/a><\/u><\/em><\/p>\n

Every year, we take a multidisciplinary approach to a particular theme. This year, too, we, the organising committee, tried very hard to find speakers from various backgrounds. Our list of speakers can be said to be highly diverse this year, since our speakers include politicians, scientists and members of the business community.<\/p>\n\n\t

\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t
\n\t\t\u2018Not inviting someone because his opinion differs from yours is inconsistent with academic freedom\u2019\n\t<\/blockquote>\n\n\t<\/figure>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n

As mentioned above, we do not share the opinion that Mr Baudet should not have been invited; if societal debates can and must be held anywhere, it is at universities. Not inviting someone because his opinion differs from yours is inconsistent with academic freedom. For instance, such debates may touch on what has actually been researched by scientists and what has not. We believe the current line-up of speakers provides attendees with a proper diversity of perspectives with regard to energy transition, thus allowing everyone to make up his own mind.<\/p>\n

We think it is unfortunate that such unfounded opinion pieces, without any citations, stir up exactly the kind of commotion the authors mentioned.<\/p>\n

We are looking forward to today\u2019s debate!<\/p>\n\n\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t

De redactie<\/h2>\n\t\t\n\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t