{"id":93532,"date":"2018-12-22T10:00:05","date_gmt":"2018-12-22T09:00:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.erasmusmagazine.nl\/en\/?p=93532"},"modified":"2026-02-10T16:48:23","modified_gmt":"2026-02-10T15:48:23","slug":"professor-keizer-never-settles-for-a-just-so-answer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.erasmusmagazine.nl\/en\/2018\/12\/22\/professor-keizer-never-settles-for-a-just-so-answer\/","title":{"rendered":"Professor Keizer never settles for a \u2018just-so\u2019 answer"},"content":{"rendered":"

2018 was the year when everything \u2018fell in place\u2019 for Renske Keizer: she was appointed as a full professor in Family Sociology, got the opportunity to set up her own research group and was invited to join the Young Academy.<\/p>\n

\"\"

\n\t\n\n<\/svg>\n<\/span>\n\tImage by:<\/span>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tRonald van den Heerik<\/a>\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t<\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>

Although 2017 was actually already a pretty decent prelude, with Keizer landing both a Vidi grant<\/a> (EUR 800,000) and an ERC Grant<\/a> (EUR 1.5 million). But you might say it all started back in 2014, when she was given an endowed chair in Fatherhood at the University of Amsterdam.<\/p>\n

\u201cI\u2019m quick with just about everything,\u201d quipped Keizer in a short interview<\/a> with EM at the beginning of this year on the occasion of her appointment. An early student (just turned 18), an early graduate (21) and quick to earn her doctorate (26), and become a mother (ages 24, 27 and 29 respectively). And now, at age 35, she\u2019s already a full professor.<\/p>\n

However, she isn\u2019t in a hurry to hold her inaugural lecture . \u201cMy inaugural lecture in Amsterdam wasn\u2019t that long ago. The past 18 to 24 months, all I\u2019ve been working on was funding applications. And now I\u2019m busy setting up my research team. I prefer to wait for the results of our research. After all, when people take the trouble of attending your lecture, you need to give them something new.\u201d<\/p>\n

Little professor<\/h2>

Someone who will definitely be sitting on the first row is her mother: \u201cIn Utrecht, I had to pick up my master\u2019s diploma at the information desk: I was abroad when they were holding the ceremony. She was very disappointed about that. Of course, my mother was there when they awarded me a doctorate. Occasionally, you tend to forget how important moments like these can be for the people around you.\u201d<\/p>\n

Renske Keizer was the first \u2013 and until now, the only \u2013 member of her family to go to university. She had to find out everything on her own. \u201cI went to the Studiebeurs information fair in Utrecht with a friend \u2013 no way our parents were coming too. Nowadays, the hall is full of parents during information days.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\t

\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t
\n\t\t\u2018My mother provided a constructive environment; a loving home.\u2019\n\t<\/blockquote>\n\n\t<\/figure>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n

She wanted to do something with strong social relevance. Initially, she thought about the pabo (university for teacher education), but eventually reconsidered. She went for Social Sciences. Most of her former classmates stayed closer to home, choosing a programme in Enschede or Groningen. She decided on Utrecht. She joined a student association to help with her social integration. \u2018I shouldn\u2019t keep to myself all the time after moving to a new town,\u2019 she thought, \u2018I need to make friends.\u2019 After a few years in the student association, she decided it wasn\u2019t her scene. In her year club, most people wanted to watch a soap opera on the telly after eating together. \u201cI wasn\u2019t really into that. We had different interests.\u201d<\/p>\n

She already liked learning stuff in primary school \u2013 sometimes they called her \u2018little professor\u2019. In her home region of Twente, where the tall poppy syndrome is in full effect, she stood out because she couldn\u2019t leave it at that when someone gave her a \u2018just-so\u2019 answer: \u201cNo, I remember thinking there\u2019s no way things are just a given.\u201d<\/p>\n

When she picked up her diploma, her mother \u2013 with the best intentions \u2013 said: \u201cjust put it in your bag, otherwise the other kids might feel bad.\u201d Incidentally, this is the same mother who started on a post-postgraduate continuing professional education programme after Keizer earned her doctorate, she adds with some pride. \u201cMy mother provided a constructive environment; a loving home.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/svg>\n\t\t<\/button>

\n\t\n\n<\/svg>\n<\/span>\n\tImage by:<\/span>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tRonald van den Heerik<\/a>\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t<\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>

Fatherhood<\/h2>

Things could have gone differently though, because she actually grew up without her biological father. Her parents divorced when she was two, and she\u2019s no longer in touch with her father. Which brings us to the inevitable question: do you think your own background growing up without a \u2018real\u2019 father is a source for your research into family relationships and fatherhood?<\/p>\n

Keizer understands why we\u2019d ask that and patiently explains that her research didn\u2019t necessarily originate in her own fatherless childhood. She actually came across this subject by accident. She had applied for a doctoral position that involved researching childlessness. Preparing for this research, she was struck by the fact that research into childlessness focussed exclusively on women \u2013 never men. And this set off her somewhat stubborn curiosity again: who said that it doesn\u2019t have an impact on men if they don\u2019t have children, or are unable to conceive? Has anyone ever done any research in this area?<\/p>\n\n\t

\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t
\n\t\t\u2018Of course, it was confronting for me every now and then\u2019\n\t<\/blockquote>\n\n\t<\/figure>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n

And this was the germ of her interest in fatherhood and researching fathers\u2019 roles in childrearing. It was only later that she realised that her own past must have unconsciously played a part in all this. \u201cOf course, it was confronting for me every now and then. When research shows that fathers play an important role in building children\u2019s self-confidence, for example \u2013 particularly in the case of daughters.\u201d But she\u2019s already \u2018dealt with it\u2019 and doesn\u2019t feel like dwelling on it for too long.<\/p>\n

Particularly since for the past 18 to 24 months she seems to have been on a roll. Although she\u2019d like to clear a few misconceptions here. \u201cWhen I was appointed as a member of the Young Academy . last month, some of my colleagues were like \u2018Renske again\u2026\u2019 Because what they put up on the panels (the information displays at ESSB where they post faculty news, Eds.) tends to be success stories. What they don\u2019t write is: Renske was rejected in the first round of ERC Grant applications \u2013 even though that happened too. And another thing that\u2019s never on there is \u2018Your colleague such-and-so just scored a 9 out of 10 on a professional evaluation.\u2019\u201d By which she means to say that the plaudits don\u2019t necessarily go to people who are just as deserving: those who work as educators, for example.<\/p>\n

And ambitious as she is, she even set up a new master programme last year, called Social Inequalities. This programme focuses on growing social inequality in society and how this insidious problem<\/a> can be addressed through the right policies. \u201cI\u2019m responsible for the Introduction to Sociology courses given at the start of the academic year. I thought: well that leaves me with time to continue working on the master programme that starts in January. The one thing I didn\u2019t think of is that all the information brochures and texts actually need to be done by then. So I ended up doing both at the same time.\u201d<\/p>\n

Over the course of 2018, she also became more and more accustomed to her new role. She was no longer first and foremost a researcher; she\u2019s a manager now. And she\u2019s enjoying it. \u201cI\u2019m good at separating the main issues from side issues. I\u2019m efficient and I\u2019m usually able to get people on board.\u201d She is currently heading a team of some nine researchers (from trainee research assistants to post-docs and an assistant professor). As well as a club of student-assistants who visit people in their homes for field research, to map out which roles mothers and fathers play in the development of their children. \u201cI\u2019ve let them practice on my own family,\u201d she tells us.<\/p>\n

Top research and still go home in time<\/h2>

Her own family (husband and three children aged 5, 7 and 10) is important to Keizer. That\u2019s why on a regular week day, she leaves for home at 4:30 to pick up the children. This year she finally managed to persuade her husband to drop them off at school in the morning. She wants to show people \u2013 and not least her younger female colleagues \u2013 that it\u2019s possible: perform world-class research, become a professor and still be home on time in the evening.<\/p>\n

\u201cI want to impart on my younger colleagues what I learned from others myself: that you need to work on your profile and build your network. For example, always be sure to ask a question during conferences. This allows you to stand out from the crowd, and afterwards, there\u2019s a big chance that someone will approach you to discuss the matter in further detail. I did this during a conference one time; it\u2019s how I got involved in the successful application for an ORA grant (totalling over EUR 1 million) with colleagues from Germany, the UK, France and Japan. I asked a question: I picked up one of those mikes in a hall with people. And got talking with people afterwards. That was the seed of what ultimately became a joint funding application.\u201d<\/p>\n

Of course, she also knows the stories about women in science having fewer career opportunities than their male counterparts. Although she hasn\u2019t experienced too much obstruction personally \u2013 but this could also be attributed to what they call the \u2018survivor effect\u2019, she notes. Someone can make it in spite of opposition, rather than thanks to a lack of opposition.<\/p>\n

\"\"\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/svg>\n\t\t<\/button>

\n\t\n\n<\/svg>\n<\/span>\n\tImage by:<\/span>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tRonald van den Heerik<\/a>\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t<\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>

Competent individuals<\/h2>

\u201cYou need to have people around you who are supportive and help you achieve your goals,\u201d she says. She\u2019s referring to her mentor, professor of Empirical Sociology Pearl Dykstra, who also served as her doctoral supervisor. And she was delighted that she could become professor herself, slightly earlier than expected, via the Westerdijk Talent Impulse programme<\/a> . This extra funding from NWO could be used by the Netherlands\u2019 universities to nominate talented female scientists for a professorship, to boost the share of senior women academics.<\/p>\n\n\t

\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t
\n\t\t\u2018I didn\u2019t have to wait until someone retired.\u2019\n\t<\/blockquote>\n\n\t<\/figure>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n

Although Keizer knew that she would probably land a chair at some point in the foreseeable future. Somewhere at least. At receptions, people would ask her whether she still liked working in Rotterdam. And those inquiries eventually reach your boss\u2019s ears too. But thanks to the Westerdijk Talent Impulse, the funds required to appoint Keizer to a full professorship were available without further restrictions. \u201cI didn\u2019t have to wait until someone retired.\u201d<\/p>\n

She has followed the debate<\/a> that has been going on within Erasmus University about this subject. EUR only filled four of the seven chairs that could be paid for with NWO money. Responding to the argument that women could experience such an appointment as a stigma \u2013 as suggested<\/a> by those faculties that declined to nominate a female academic for a Westerdijk chair \u2013 she says: \u201cMy own experience is neutral. The people who were ultimately put forward and appointed are all very competent individuals.\u201d And she\u2019d like to leave it at that.<\/p>\n

Sowing not harvesting<\/h2>

It\u2019s not that she lacks a political perspective. In fact, it\u2019s one of the reasons why she wanted to join the Young Academy. \u201cThere\u2019s no better time than our own to be a member. You\u2019ve got distrust in science, there\u2019s the issue of how best to gauge quality, career policy issues, ethical questions, etc. I\u2019m interested in working on issues like these. And it\u2019s good to know that they also appreciate this within the faculty. When they announced my appointment, the university showered me with flowers. Let\u2019s wait and see if the appreciation is also reflected in my time budget,\u201d she adds with a grin.<\/p>\n

Because you can\u2019t do everything. Renske Keizer has to set priorities too. \u201cThe past two years, I published a lot less than before because I invested a lot of time in my team. And I no longer say \u2018yes\u2019 every time the media or policy-makers ask me to make an appearance. Because they keep asking me to talk about paternity leave: that\u2019s the research theme most people know me for. I want to have something new to tell people. The period ahead is all about sowing. Harvesting will have to wait for the moment.\u201d<\/p>\n\t

\n\t\t

CV<\/p>\n

Prof. dr. Dr Renske Keizer<\/a> (1983)
\n2005 – Study of General Social Sciences, Utrecht University
\n2010 – PhD at NIDI<\/a> in The Hague, promoter Prof. Dr. Pearl Dykstra<\/a>
\n2010-2018 – Postdoc, assistant professor, associate professor, Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences
\n2014 \u2013 Endowed Professor of Fatherhood, University of Amsterdam
\n2018 – Professor of Family Sociology, Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences<\/p>\n\n\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t

De redactie<\/h2>\n\t\t\n\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t