{"id":66959,"date":"2017-02-22T14:33:41","date_gmt":"2017-02-22T13:33:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.erasmusmagazine.nl\/?p=66959\/"},"modified":"2025-12-19T11:22:38","modified_gmt":"2025-12-19T10:22:38","slug":"reacties-op-motie-duisenberg-er-heerst-een-verstikkende-consensus-op-de-univeristeit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.erasmusmagazine.nl\/en\/2017\/02\/22\/reacties-op-motie-duisenberg-er-heerst-een-verstikkende-consensus-op-de-univeristeit\/","title":{"rendered":"Responses to Duisenberg\u2019s motion: \u2018There is a stifling consensus at universities\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"

De Tweede Kamer<\/span><\/p>

\n\t\n\n<\/svg>\n<\/span>\n\tImage by:<\/span>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t-JvL-<\/a>\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t<\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>

Ethical and political opinions are getting in the way of free science in the Netherlands, a majority of Dutch MPs feel. For this reason, Pieter Duisenberg, an MP representing the Liberal Party (VVD), promoted a motion for an investigation of political bias at Dutch universities. EM asked three academics to weigh in on the subject.<\/p>\n

\u2018I have never experienced any pressure here\u2019<\/h3>
\"\"

Elbert Dijkgraaf<\/span><\/p>

\n\t\n\n<\/svg>\n<\/span>\n\tImage by:<\/span>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tGeisje van der Linden<\/a>\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t<\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>

Elbert Dijkgraaf<\/strong> is a Professor of Empirical Economics in the Public Sector at ESE. He is also an MP representing SGP [the Reformed Political Party]. SGP supported Duisenberg\u2019s motion.<\/p>\n

\u201cOf course it is a good idea to examine whether this is an issue in the Netherlands, too. I have experienced in the past that unwelcome research results were consciously swept under the rug. This concerned agricultural research at Wageningen University. The senior levels of the university were not involved, but there were a few capacity groups whose main objective appeared to be proving that the results they had previously obtained were correct. That is worrisome to me.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis should not be an investigation of people\u2019s political preferences. And it won\u2019t be a problem either if it turns out that a lot of people at universities have leftist sympathies, or rightist sympathies. As far as that is concerned, universities do not have to reflect society at large. What matters is that academics do not allow their private sentiments to play a part in their research.<\/p>\n

\u201cI have worked at Erasmus University ever since 1996, and I have never experienced any of that kind of pressure here.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u2018There is a stifling consensus at universities\u2019<\/h3>
\"\"

Chris Aalberts<\/span><\/p>

\n\t\n\n<\/svg>\n<\/span>\n\tImage by:<\/span>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tMichel de Groot<\/a>\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t<\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>

Chris Aalberts<\/strong> is a lecturer at ESHCC and an investigator of media and politics. His publications include a book entitled De puinhopen van rechts<\/em> [The mess on the right side of the political spectrum].<\/p>\n

\u201cThere is a stifling consensus at universities when it comes to certain values. Of course you will not be fired for admitting to voting PVV, but you will be looked down on. Surely highly educated people don\u2019t vote PVV, do they? But why wouldn\u2019t they? And obviously, this is the part where I\u2019m supposed to say that I myself do not vote PVV.<\/p>\n

\u201cRightist sympathies are unusual in social sciences. There is a strong ethical hierarchy. The discourse on cultural values is racist, and a multi-cultural society is a wonderful thing. We are all in favour of emancipating women and gay people, except when their champion is called Ayaan Hirsi Ali. So Duisenberg definitely has a point.<\/p>\n

\u201cNot everything gets investigated. Certain specialist fields just do not exist, which is strange. I mean, there is no majority of PVV voters, but PVV voters do make up a large group. Even so I have never read a single decent academic study investigating why people vote PVV or Leefbaar Rotterdam.<\/p>\n

\u201cAs far as that is concerned, VVD should look at its own part in all this, because they were partially responsible for the single-minded focus on results and the way in which research is currently funded, which leaves little room for socially relevant research.<\/p>\n

\u201cA motion like this one is not going to resolve that situation. At the same time I feel that universities should not fear a study, because how sure are we that this is not true \u2013 that universities are a leftist bulwark?<\/p>\n

\u201cBy the way, if universities really did lean to the left, they should do a little bit more for underprivileged people, and I don\u2019t see that happening either.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u2018This motion isjust for show\u2019<\/h3>
<\/div>

Giorgio Touburg<\/strong> is a PhD student at the Rotterdam School of Management, as well as columnist for EM. He recently discussed alleged self-censorship at universities in his column.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is hard to say anything about this without getting political. I think that certain disciplines \u2013 such as the humanities \u2013 <\/em>tend to select people who lean a little more towards the left. This was not caused by an active ideological campaign. People who wish to do something about inequality or social injustice are simply more likely to embark on a degree in sociology than on a degree in finance. This does not necessarily have to constitute a problem, because the various disciplines can learn from each other.<\/p>\n

\u201cI don\u2019t think other science disciplines are too bad. I work at the Business Administration department, where I am considered more of a leftie than most people. And economists are often criticised for relying overly heavily on neoclassical models in their teaching and research.<\/p>\n

\u201cI think it would be very interesting to look into this, but at the same time I am apprehensive about this study. Who knows what agenda is behind this proposal, or how Duisenberg intends to use the study results? What is he going to do if it turns out that the humanities strongly incline to the left? Will a diversity policy for political sentiments have to be implemented at universities? And if so, does that mean that faculties of economics will be forced to lecture on Marx?<\/p>\n

\u201cDuisenberg outlined a taboo situation in which rightist academics are afraid to voice their opinions. I don\u2019t recognise that at all, and I\u2019ve never seen any concrete evidence that it is true. I do understand that VVD is zeroing in on a lucrative trend in public opinion, which is the idea that we are all being silenced by politically correct mad leftists. But it\u2019s campaign time, and it\u2019s pretty obvious that this motion was just for show.\u201d<\/p>\n

more<\/h2>