{"id":182301,"date":"2025-10-09T10:43:54","date_gmt":"2025-10-09T08:43:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.erasmusmagazine.nl\/en\/?p=182301"},"modified":"2026-01-22T14:45:20","modified_gmt":"2026-01-22T13:45:20","slug":"artists-like-bob-vylan-and-kneecap-are-more-than-just-a-mirror-of-society","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.erasmusmagazine.nl\/en\/2025\/10\/09\/artists-like-bob-vylan-and-kneecap-are-more-than-just-a-mirror-of-society\/","title":{"rendered":"‘Artists like Bob Vylan and Kneecap are more than just a mirror of society’"},"content":{"rendered":"

From \u2018Death to the IDF\u2019 to \u2018Up Hamas, up Hezbollah\u2019: artists like Bob Vylan and Kneecap are voicing fierce opposition to the war in Gaza, provoking strong reactions. Performances are being cancelled, politicians are weighing in, and venues are struggling with the limits of artistic freedom. Cultural sociologist Pauwke Berkers sees more in the controversy than just a reflection of polarisation. \u201cArtists are trying to close the recognition gap.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"

\n\t\n\n<\/svg>\n<\/span>\n\tImage by:<\/span>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tBas van der Schot<\/a>\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t<\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>

Pauwke Berkers is professor of Sociology of Popular Music. His research focuses on inequality in the music industry, with attention to themes such as decolonisation, gender and inclusion. He also studies the role of music in social issues and is co-founder of the Rotterdam Popular Music Studies research group.<\/p>\n

Why is there so much uproar lately about acts like Bob Vylan and Kneecap?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cProtest music is nothing new, nor are strong reactions to it, but controversies are now picked up and amplified much faster thanks to social media. Gen Z is politically engaged and expects artists to take a stand.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhat\u2019s more, research on moral panics shows that something only becomes an incident once politicians get involved. That\u2019s exactly what we\u2019re seeing now. Politicians try \u2013 with varying degrees of success \u2013 to exploit the uproar.\u201d<\/p>\n

Are you referring to VVD party leader Dilan Ye\u015filg\u00f6z, who accused Douwe Bob of antisemitism?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cYes. It\u2019s actually impressive how far off the mark she was. It was completely the wrong tone, and the wrong artist. A segment of Douwe Bob\u2019s fanbase votes VVD. And it\u2019s much harder to take a swing at a folk singer like Douwe Bob than at Bob Vylan. That band makes aggressive music and puts forward a clearer political message, which makes them an easier target than Douwe Bob.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/svg>\n\t\t<\/button>

\n\t\n\n<\/svg>\n<\/span>\n\tImage by:<\/span>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tBas van der Schot<\/a>\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t<\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>

What do you make of Bob Vylan\u2019s comments? After the murder of Charlie Kirk, the band\u2019s frontman said: \u201cIf you chat shit you will get banged. Rest in peace Charlie Kirk, you piece of shit.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cEvery music genre comes with certain conventions and audience expectations. Punk goes hand in hand with political engagement, whereas you\u2019d expect less of that from country. That\u2019s why things went wrong in 2003 with the Dixie Chicks, a country band that spoke out<\/a> harshly against Bush, which their audience didn\u2019t appreciate. They were boycotted by country radio stations, and some fans even burned their albums in protest. In the Netherlands, you\u2019ve got Bennie Jolink, who\u2019s made critical remarks<\/a> about the farmers\u2019 protests that don\u2019t quite align with his rural fanbase. That can be a risk commercially. But with punk, it\u2019s the other way around: fans expect outspoken opinions. It would actually be weird if a band like Bob Vylan didn\u2019t speak out politically.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn the media, I often hear festival organisers<\/a> saying protest acts like Bob Vylan or Kneecap \u2018reflect\u2019 society\u2019s polarisation. That\u2019s too simplistic. Artists aren\u2019t passive reflectors. They consciously choose which themes to address, which conflicts to escalate or de-escalate, and in doing so, add their own layer to the social debate.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\t

\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t
\n\t\t\u2018It\u2019s telling that the focus is currently on Palestine, literally a state that isn\u2019t recognised and therefore has no voice in its own future\u2019\n\t<\/blockquote>\n\n\t<\/figure>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n

How does that work?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cArtists connect with what sociologist Mich\u00e8le Lamont calls \u2018recognition chains\u2019. Artists, NGOs, journalists and politicians each contribute to raising awareness for groups that don\u2019t have a voice in the debate.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s telling that the focus is currently on Palestine, literally a state that isn\u2019t recognised and therefore has no voice in its own future. Artists choose to speak out about that because they believe media and political representation is skewed. Their contribution isn\u2019t always coordinated or part of a formal social movement, but together they form a chain of voices trying to close the recognition gap.\u201d<\/p>\n

Is the resurgence of protest music today comparable to the protest music of the sixties and seventies?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cBack then, you had Bob Dylan providing the soundtrack for the civil rights movement and the protests against the Vietnam War. It\u2019s ironic that now we have Bob Vylan, giving voice to left-wing sentiment around the war in Gaza. The difference is that in the sixties, the US was directly involved in a dubious war, and artists openly opposed it. In today\u2019s conflicts, Western governments are more indirectly involved. But again now, a broader social movement seems to be emerging, with music playing a key role.\u201d<\/p>\n

Is there also right-wing protest music?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cMost protest music is left-wing, but right-wing protest music certainly exists. In the 1980s, there was an entire far-right skinhead scene, with bands spreading nationalist or racist messages. There are also artists who speak out from a conservative or right-wing perspective, like Kanye West. Many country artists are very vocally pro-Trump.<\/p>\n

\u201cMusic is also repurposed by right-wing groups. Bruce Springsteen\u2019s Born in the USA<\/em>, actually a protest song about the Vietnam War, is regularly used as a patriotic anthem at Republican rallies, despite Springsteen\u2019s objections<\/a>. And during the anti-migration protest in The Hague, gabber music was played. That\u2019s not right-wing music per se, but it was used that way in that context.<\/p>\n

\u201cMusic genres often have both left-wing and right-wing variants. Punk had Skrewdriver, a neo-Nazi band. And black metal includes left-wing bands like Terzij de Horde, but also extremist black metal bands that use Nazi slogans and symbols. That kind of music doesn\u2019t reach the mainstream, so we hear less about it.\u201d<\/p>\n

Do artists with left-wing messages receive different reactions than those with right-wing views?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cTo know if there\u2019s a structural difference in responses, you\u2019d need proper research. There\u2019s simply more left-wing sentiment in the music sector, so naturally the uproar often centres on left-wing artists. I do know that right-wing acts have been boycotted in the past \u2013 like the American band Type O Negative, whose 1991 concert at the Melkweg was cancelled under pressure from Antifa. What you often see is that individual artists refuse to perform at festivals or venues if certain right-wing bands are also on the bill.\u201d<\/p>\n

After Bob Vylan\u2019s comments in Paradiso, venue 013 chose to cancel the performance, while Doornroosje went ahead with theirs. Should venues not stand by the artists they\u2019ve booked, or is there a limit to artistic freedom?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cThe limit is the law. But pop venues also follow their own moral compass. 013 clearly felt the comment about Charlie Kirk\u2019s murder crossed a line. I found it telling that the people at Doornroosje said they understood 013\u2019s decision. So it wasn\u2019t as though they accused 013 of cowardice. This is a hot topic in the live music world. Everyone finds it difficult, especially since venues have to make quick decisions and those decisions are immediately scrutinised on social media.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/svg>\n\t\t<\/button><\/figure>

How do financial interests affect the programming decisions of venues and festivals, including in moments like this?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cThe pop sector has become serious business over the past decades \u2013 increasingly professionalised and financialised. Equity fund KKR, through festival organiser Superstruct Entertainment, owns dozens of festivals, including some in the Netherlands. That\u2019s a private equity firm that invests in industries artists and fans typically don\u2019t support, such as fossil fuels and weapons.<\/p>\n

\u201cCosts have gone up significantly, and the financial risks are huge. It\u2019s no surprise festivals are struggling to remain independent. But that puts them in a difficult position. Many pop venues were born out of the activist culture of the 60s \u2013 sometimes even the punk movement. The people working there often still hold those values. But the supervisory boards are often made up of people from the corporate world. That leads to conflicting interests. Sometimes you see management making decisions that don\u2019t sit well with the staff. For instance, pop venue Annabel once rented out its space for a day to Leefbaar Rotterdam, despite usually preaching inclusivity. That really upset some of the volunteers.\u201d<\/p>\n

What do you think of AVROTROS\u2019 decision to withdraw from Eurovision if Israel participates?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cForeign minister David van Weel responded by saying we shouldn\u2019t politicise Eurovision. But that\u2019s na\u00efve. Music is always about identity \u2013 about shared backgrounds and who you share them with. And Eurovision, in particular, is political. Just like sport, it\u2019s about national representation. Participating means recognition. And some countries consistently vote for each other. There was even proven interference by the Israeli government in the last edition of Eurovision, according to AVROTROS. That illustrates just how strong the political stakes are in Eurovision. The fact that AVROTROS made this decision despite the pressure on public broadcasters makes it, in my view, a powerful statement.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\t

\n\t\t\n\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Read more<\/h2>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t