{"id":160769,"date":"2023-11-06T16:15:04","date_gmt":"2023-11-06T15:15:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.erasmusmagazine.nl\/en\/?p=160769"},"modified":"2025-12-19T11:27:02","modified_gmt":"2025-12-19T10:27:02","slug":"interest-rate-on-student-debt-to-rise-despite-political-opposition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.erasmusmagazine.nl\/en\/2023\/11\/06\/interest-rate-on-student-debt-to-rise-despite-political-opposition\/","title":{"rendered":"Interest rate on student debt to rise, despite political opposition"},"content":{"rendered":"

The interest rate on student debt will rise to 2.56 percent next year, even for students who missed out on the chance of a basic student grant. The House of Representatives wanted to freeze interest rates for this group, but the government says that is impossible at present.<\/p>\n

\"\"

\n\t\n\n<\/svg>\n<\/span>\n\tImage by:<\/span>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tJosine Henneken<\/a>\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t<\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>

The basic student grant has now been reinstated but students in recent years had to rely solely on the student loan system. This group point out that they are hardest hit: the lack of a grant meant they had to borrow more, and now they will have to pay thousands of euros in interest.<\/p>\n

A majority in the House of Representatives is in favour of freezing their interest rate at the 2023 level. But in response to a motion submitted by GroenLinks and ChristenUnie, outgoing education minister Robbert Dijkgraaf writes<\/a> that this cannot be done in the short term.<\/p>\n

2026 at the earliest<\/h2>

The problem, Dijkgraaf explains, is that the plan is not technically feasible for DUO, the agency that administers student financing. \u201cA measure like this requires major adjustments to DUO\u2019s systems, and these cannot be realised until 1 January 2026 at the earliest.\u201d<\/p>\n

In other words, any interest-rate freeze can only be implemented two years later than the House of Representatives wanted. The necessary changes to the law on student financing cannot be made before 1 January in any case. In addition, DUO is facing several other complex challenges next year.<\/p>\n

The parties behind the motion may have seen this coming. The wording includes a request to \u201cbroaden\u201d the motion \u201cif it is not possible in terms of implementation\u201d. Dijkgraaf has promised to see what he can do.<\/p>\n

Expats<\/h2>

As the education minister previously warned, keeping the interest rate low would cost billions of euros. The House of Representatives proposes covering the cost by curtailing the tax breaks currently available to knowledge workers who come to the Netherlands from abroad.<\/p>\n

Scaling down the expat scheme was a plan put forward by Pieter Omtzigt. He also wanted to use these funds to curb interest on student debt. Although his amendment was passed<\/a> by the House, Omtzigt suspects that it will not yield enough to freeze the interest rate altogether. For this reason, he was the only one to join the VVD in voting against the motion by GroenLinks and ChristenUnie.<\/p>\n

Parliamentary questions<\/h2>

Responding to parliamentary questions on the interest rate rise, Dijkgraaf writes, \u201cI can imagine that this will cause concern among students and former students.\u201d But he also points out the favourable terms that apply to student loans.<\/p>\n

He reminds the House that there was never any guarantee that the rate would remain at zero. \u201cWhat students were<\/em> told, is that this is a favourable loan. I still stand by that statement. The interest is still many times lower than market rates.\u201d<\/p>\n

He also emphasises that a former student\u2019s ability to repay is always taken into account. If your income drops below a certain threshold, your repayments are scaled back accordingly, and in some cases even suspended. \u201cWhen it comes to interest too, former students never pay more than they can afford.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t

De redactie<\/h2>\n\t\t\n\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t