{"id":160098,"date":"2023-10-20T16:47:46","date_gmt":"2023-10-20T14:47:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.erasmusmagazine.nl\/en\/?p=160098"},"modified":"2025-12-19T11:27:01","modified_gmt":"2025-12-19T10:27:01","slug":"news-website-scienceguide-suffers-from-legal-harassment-by-maastricht-university","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.erasmusmagazine.nl\/en\/2023\/10\/20\/news-website-scienceguide-suffers-from-legal-harassment-by-maastricht-university\/","title":{"rendered":"News website ScienceGuide suffers from ‘legal harassment’ by Maastricht University"},"content":{"rendered":"

News platform ScienceGuide<\/em> has clashed with one of its funders, Maastricht University, accusing it of legal intimidation and silencing the free press. Maastricht denies any wrongdoing.<\/p>

\"\"

Maastricht university\n<\/span><\/p>

\n\t\n\n<\/svg>\n<\/span>\n\tImage by:<\/span>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tKleon3<\/a>\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t<\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>

Amid the recent controversy<\/a> surrounding the Eindhoven university magazine Cursor<\/em>, which started with the sacking of that publication\u2019s editor-in-chief and the editors blacking out the website in protest, ScienceGuide reported that it had also suffered from legal harassment.<\/p>\n

This week, the platform, which publishes news articles and opinion pieces related to higher education and research, offered further context<\/a>. As it turns out, ScienceGuide is involved in a legal dispute with Maastricht University, which is reclaiming 50,000 euros in funding. It is doing so after it demanded that the news website rectify one of its articles.<\/p>\n

\u2018Position elsewhere\u2019<\/h2>

The controversial article, published last July, was about a Maastricht professor who had \u2013 wrongly \u2013 accused a colleague of sexual misconduct. The professor was suspended and, as ScienceGuide put it, was to be given a \u2018position elsewhere\u2019.<\/p>\n

According to Maastricht University, the original article contained factual errors and was unnecessarily damaging to one of its employees. Following its publication, the university demanded rectification under threat of legal action.<\/p>\n

Although the article was amended as requested, ScienceGuide was left puzzled by the severity of the university\u2019s response \u2013 don\u2019t we all make mistakes from time to time? And couldn\u2019t this have been resolved with a simple phone call or email? Moreover, such legal proceedings would have been prohibitively expensive for a small news organisation.<\/p>\n

'Probably the end of ScienceGuide'<\/h2>

But the story didn\u2019t end there, as Maastricht University is now demanding that ScienceGuide <\/em>pay back its funding. \u201cScienceGuide has been funded by valued partners from the higher education sector for over 20 years\u201d, the editorial board writes. \u201cThrough their contributions, we are able to offer an open platform for news and opinion articles as well as information about our partners themselves.\u201d<\/p>\n

ScienceGuide\u2019s list of partners<\/a> includes four universities, eight universities of applied sciences and three other organisations. Maastricht University is still listed, but according to the university its agreement with ScienceGuide expired back in 2021. That\u2019s why it is now demanding back 50,000 euros in funding paid out over the last two years.<\/p>\n

\u201cSuccessful recovery would probably mean the end of ScienceGuide\u201d, argue the editors, who have hired a lawyer. \u201cWe wonder if this is the new norm. Should higher education media like ScienceGuide prepare for a future in which financial, legal and employment threats become matters of editorial policy?\u201d<\/p>\n

No obligations<\/h2>

But according to the university, there is no connection between the rectification request and the dispute over the partnership agreement. The university simply had no financial obligations to ScienceGuide, it asserts.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is completely wrong to suggest that Maastricht University \u2018seeks to thwart the publication of facts, criticism or substantiated views and opinions\u2019\u201d, the university writes in a statement. \u201cLet there be no misunderstanding: we wish to see ScienceGuide<\/em> continue its journalistic work. Last summer\u2019s discussion shows that, as it does so, we must remain vigilant and critical with regard to inaccuracies, as should be expected of us. To avoid conflicts of interest, we believe that news media and organisations like ours should be as free as possible from financial or other ties.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t

De redactie<\/h2>\n\t\t\n\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t