{"id":149240,"date":"2023-01-26T13:27:21","date_gmt":"2023-01-26T12:27:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.erasmusmagazine.nl\/en\/?p=149240"},"modified":"2025-12-19T11:26:37","modified_gmt":"2025-12-19T10:26:37","slug":"positive-and-impactful-research-currently-not-tenable-at-this-university","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.erasmusmagazine.nl\/en\/2023\/01\/26\/positive-and-impactful-research-currently-not-tenable-at-this-university\/","title":{"rendered":"Positive and impactful research \u2018currently not tenable at this university\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"

If this university wants to enable ‘positive’ and ‘impactful’ research, something has to change. From conversations with academics, it has emerged that the university currently relies too much on the leisure time of researchers who feel they receive little support. “You have to jointly reflect on the meaning of terms like ‘positive’ and ‘impact’, otherwise they become empty words”, says researcher Julia Wittmayer.<\/p>\n

\"\"

\n\t\n\n<\/svg>\n<\/span>\n\tImage by:<\/span>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tJosine Henneken<\/a>\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t<\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>

The university\u2019s current mission is \u2018to have a positive social impact\u2019. According to Mayte Beekman and Julia Wittmayer of the Design Impact Transition (DIT) platform, that is a great commitment. The platform<\/a> was launched in part to facilitate and encourage research \u2018on complex and persistent social challenges\u2019. To this end, Beekman and Wittmayer began a study on what motivates researchers to do this kind of research and what obstacles they encounter.<\/p>\n

Beekman and Wittmayer spoke to 23 academics from various faculties along with eight support staff. All of these researchers are already focusing on what Wittmayer describes as \u2018engaged or participatory and socially engaged research\u2019. From the conversations it emerged that they are primarily driven by a deep conviction of the importance of these types of studies. The list of obstacles<\/a> was considerably longer, Beekman and Wittmayer say. Based on this list, they formulated four lessons learned for the Executive Board.<\/p>\n

Pretty ambitious<\/h2>

\u201cThe implementation of the mission is quite ambitious, so it will be a long process\u201d, Wittmayer explains. \u201cWe have to go through this together. The mission is currently being carried out by a handful of enthusiastic, passionate researchers. There are support services, but the researchers feel they don\u2019t get enough support and their concerns are not being heard. Conducting engaged research is currently not tenable at this university.\u201d<\/p>\n

Wittmayer sees that the university\u2019s central administration does a lot to implement the mission, for example by launching initiatives and projects. \u201cThings don\u2019t get off the ground in the same way at faculties. Thus far, no structures are being changed to support a type of research that is critical of the current status quo. The researchers interviewed called the deans \u2018a stumbling block to change\u2019.\u201d<\/p>\n

Obstacles<\/h2>\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t
\n\t\t\u2018You want academics who engage with society instead of staying in their ivory tower\u2019\n\t<\/blockquote>\n\n\t<\/figure>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n

The researchers they talked to told Beekman and Wittmayer they don\u2019t have enough time. \u201cConducting socially engaged research is more time-consuming than traditional academic research\u201d, Beekman explains. According to Beekman, this is because researchers collaborate with parties outside the walls of the university. For example, if you\u2019re doing research on and together with people living below the poverty line, it\u2019s important to build a relationship. \u201cYou want academics who engage with society instead of staying in their ivory tower\u201d, Wittmayer adds. \u201cThat requires a time investment researchers can\u2019t afford to make right now.\u201d<\/p>\n

Researchers who do invest the time do not feel appreciation from managers. The university is working on an assessment system where academics will be assessed on more than just the grants they win and the articles they publish. Those doing engaged research have as yet noticed little change as a result of this, Beekman says. That raises concerns about their career prospects. \u201cEngaged research is not a focal point like teaching, research and management\u201d, Wittmayer explains. \u201cResearchers only get room for it after they have a permanent appointment, and even then it still requires them to work in their leisure time. This does not motivate academics to choose this kind of research.\u201d<\/p>\n

(Lack of) support <\/h2>
\"\"\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/svg>\n\t\t<\/button>

\n\t\n\n<\/svg>\n<\/span>\n\tImage by:<\/span>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tJosine Henneken<\/a>\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t<\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>

Because engaged research involves more than just conducting research, researchers need support from university services like HR and communications. Beekman: \u201cTake, for instance, setting up a workshop in Rotterdam-Zuid. What is the best way to do this? How can you reach specific groups?\u201d<\/p>\n

The lack of support from people in positions of authority and policymakers is another obstacle, Beekman says. \u201cThis includes the Executive Board as well as deans and doctoral supervisors. The university\u2019s strategy focuses on impactful research, but researchers don\u2019t always feel that support from administrators and professors.\u201d<\/p>\n

Classes<\/h2>

In their report<\/a>, Beekman and Wittmayer make four recommendations. \u201cYou have to jointly define terms like \u2018positive\u2019 and \u2018impact\u2019, otherwise they become empty words\u201d, Wittmayer says. According to her, these discussions are being held, but in different departments and often with a focus on measurement and frameworks. There should also be a single platform that facilitates participatory and socially engaged research and education, where researchers can share experiences. \u201cPut one thing in place for 15 years. I\u2019m afraid that if this doesn\u2019t happen, a new strategy will be introduced in a few years and participatory and socially engaged research will not be expanded, but forgotten.\u201d<\/p>\n

According to Beekman, clarity needs to be provided about the career opportunities for academics who want to conduct engaged research. \u201cThat clarity has to come from higher up.\u201d Beekman says this also relates to the question of \u2018what the EUR\u2019s role is in tackling social issues\u2019. Beekman and Wittmayer believe that if the university shows that socially engaged research is a long-term mission, more researchers might be willing to take that step.<\/p>\n\t

\n\t\t

Response from Executive Board<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cWe have read the DIT\u2019s report on engaged research with great interest. The conclusions contain interesting findings that offer good tools for discussing social impact with the EUR community. The points mentioned are also central to our current strategy and programmes. An example of this is the Evaluating Societal Impact<\/a> project, which works for and with the EUR community to develop methods to evaluate the social impact of EUR research and education. We realise that there is still a lot of work to be done; change takes time. The conclusions in the report confirm this.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\t<\/div>\n\n\t

\n\t\t\n\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Lees meer<\/h2>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t